Measure the impact first: two separate questions
Undocumented cash purchases affect two different things: input VAT credits, and the deductibility of the cost. Input VAT credits generally depend strictly on a valid invoice; without one there is usually nothing to claim. Deducting the cost requires showing the expense really happened, relates to the business and is adequately supported. No invoice makes that harder, and how much room remains is for your accountant to judge on the facts and current rules.
So the first step is for your accountant to list these cash purchases: date, payee, item, quantity, amount, how it was paid and whether any document exists. Then sort them into three groups: partly supported by documents, supported only by internal records, and supported by nothing. Total them by amount and period, and estimate the effect on tax if they can be neither credited nor deducted.
That figure decides how hard you need to push. If the impact is small, focus on fixing the process going forward. If it is large or spans several periods, talk seriously with your accountant and lawyer about whether returns already filed need to be amended; see how an amended BIR return works.
Do this listing before talking to any supplier. Knowing the totals and the gaps first stops the conversation drifting toward "just give me an invoice for the round amount", which is exactly the kind of fix you must avoid.
Share the summary with the directors, not just the finance team. Undocumented spending is usually a management habit rather than an accounting slip, and it will only change if the people who approve purchases see what it is costing the company in lost credits and audit risk.
What you must never do: buy, borrow or back-date invoices
Buying invoices, having an unrelated company issue them, or getting a batch of back-dated invoices to "complete" your documents is a serious legal risk, not a fix. There are people who sell invoices for any item and amount you name. Those invoices come from issuers with no real transaction behind them, or describe goods and amounts that do not match what happened. Using them to book costs or claim credits is a priority target for enforcement, and the buyer may be treated as a participant.
Equally off-limits: having a related company "pass on" its purchase invoices to you, using an employee's personal receipts as company documents, combining many small cash purchases into one round-number invoice, and altering dates or amounts on internal paperwork. If any of these is found not to match a real transaction, the consequences are far worse than simply lacking an invoice.
If someone in the business is already doing this, stop now, list every such document already booked, and hand it to your accountant and lawyer. Stopping and cleaning up voluntarily leaves very different options from being caught. Background is in the risks of fake and invalid invoices.
Make the rule explicit to purchasing staff in writing, because the pressure to produce a document usually falls on them, and a clear policy protects them as well as the company.
If a supplier offers to issue an invoice in a different name or for a different item "because it is easier", the answer is no for the same reasons. The invoice must describe the real sale by the real seller.
The lawful fix: ask genuine suppliers to invoice properly
If the seller is a registered business with valid invoice booklets, you can ask them to issue a proper invoice for the real transaction, filled in truthfully and never back-dated. Whether they can still issue it, what date it carries and which period it falls into all follow tax rules, to be confirmed by both sides' accountants. The invoice can only reflect what actually happened: item, quantity and amount must match what you paid at the time.
In practice this stalls in two places. Either the seller is not registered or has no valid booklets, such as a wet-market stall or an individual tradesman who simply cannot issue a compliant invoice, or too much time has passed and the seller will not cooperate or cannot be found. In those cases do not force it. Move on to organising other evidence and accept that the input VAT cannot be claimed.
For suppliers you still use, require an invoice for every transaction from now on and make it a condition of doing business. Check whether a supplier is registered and has compliant booklets before the first order; see supplier due diligence in the Philippines. The elements a valid invoice must contain are in Philippine invoicing rules.
Ask the supplier's accountant to confirm in writing how any newly issued invoice will be dated and reported on their side, so both sets of records tell the same story.
Keep a copy of your written request to each supplier and their reply, even if they refuse. It shows you tried to regularise the transaction honestly, which can matter if the expense is questioned later and the supplier is no longer reachable.
When no invoice is possible: organise the evidence of genuineness
For spending that will never have an invoice, what you can do is assemble complete evidence that the money was really spent and really used in the business, then let your accountant judge whether, and how far, it can be deducted. Useful evidence includes cash withdrawal records matched to payment slips, delivery or receiving notes, handwritten acknowledgments from the payee showing date, item, amount and signature, chats and quotations, photos of goods or work on site, and production or sales records showing the goods were used.
File each purchase separately with a summary page: who paid, who was paid, what was bought, where the goods went and which attachments support it. Have the person who handled it and a manager sign and date the page. Do not dress up documents prepared now as if they were made at the time. Anything prepared afterwards should say so, with the reason.
Be prepared for the outcome: this evidence can help show the expense existed, but it usually cannot replace an invoice for input VAT, and the deduction may not be accepted in full. Your accountant may advise treating part of it as non-creditable and non-deductible. That is an honest result, not a failure. Record-keeping requirements are covered in the books of accounts rules.
Keep the evidence files for as long as your books must be kept. They are only useful if they can be produced when someone asks, which may be years after the purchases were made.
Where a payee refuses to sign anything, a short note from your own staff describing the purchase, made at the time, is still better than nothing.
Changing the process: make cash the exception
The real solution is to make cash purchasing the exception rather than the norm, with every exception leaving a compliant record. First, pay by transfer wherever possible, to an account in the same name as the invoice issuer, never to a personal account, and keep company and personal accounts separate; see personal versus corporate accounts. Second, for genuine small cash purchases, run a fixed petty cash fund with limits per purchase and in total, a named custodian, documents attached to every reimbursement and regular counts.
Third, vet suppliers: check a new supplier's registration and ability to invoice, and use those who cannot only when there is truly no alternative, in small amounts, with the reason recorded. Fourth, separate purchasing from payment: whoever orders does not pay, and whoever pays checks the documents. Fifth, have your accountant reconcile cash spending and documents monthly, chasing any missing invoice that month instead of at year-end.
Industries that genuinely buy from farmers or individual tradesmen, such as food service and construction, can ask their accountant whether a compliant alternative exists, for example buying through a registered intermediary or following the applicable withholding and documentation procedures. What applies depends on current rules.
Review the petty cash limits after a few months. If they are constantly exceeded, the business probably needs another registered supplier rather than a bigger cash float.
Put the new rules in a one-page purchasing policy, have managers sign it, and review compliance at the monthly reconciliation. Policies that exist only as verbal instructions tend to fade within a few weeks, especially when the busiest season arrives and speed matters more than paperwork.
If you are already being asked, and how Yixing can help
If an audit, surveillance or your external auditor asks about these undocumented expenses, explain honestly and show the evidence you have organised. Do not produce invoices on the spot. Where a written explanation is requested, reply in the way and time stated, covering the genuineness of the expenses, the corrective steps already taken and your assessment of the effect on returns filed. The audit process is described in the BIR LOA audit process.
If your auditor will not sign the financial statements, or intends to qualify the opinion because large expenses lack support, see when the auditor refuses to sign. The earlier documentation problems are dealt with, the less they disrupt annual filings and audits.
Yixing (SEC registration CS202009551, Bureau of Immigration accredited agent CA-202624381-1) offers tax compliance and incentive support to Chinese-owned businesses in the Philippines: listing undocumented expenses, organising evidence purchase by purchase, coordinating licensed accountants to assess the impact and treatment, and setting up petty cash, supplier vetting and monthly reconciliation. We do not provide or refer anyone to invoicing services, we are not a tax authority, we promise no particular outcome and we do not replace professional advice. For your specific case consult a licensed CPA or lawyer; this article is not tax or legal advice.
If you are approached during this process by anyone offering to "solve" the documentation gap for a fee, decline and tell your accountant. The only durable fix is honest records going forward.
Keep the evidence files, the policy and the reconciliation records together, so you can show not just what happened but what you changed afterwards.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can we claim input VAT on cash purchases without invoices?
Can expenses without invoices still be deducted?
Can we get someone to issue an invoice to fill the gap?
The supplier will invoice now. Can it carry the original date?
Do we need to amend returns already filed?
Market stalls and tradesmen cannot issue invoices. What then?
How do we stop this happening again?
Let’s talk through your situation — free
Every company is different. Leave your details and a Chinese-speaking advisor will get back within 1 business day with practical, industry-specific guidance and a transparent quote.
Get help with Tax Incentives → Free consultation